Most large retailers now charge for some returns. A DTC brand that copies them is copying a company with stores. Test a fee against a holdout before it goes to everyone.
Between 2024 and 2026, return fees became normal among large US retailers. Before you follow, look at what they have that you probably don’t, and at what they said happened next.
In the NRF and Happy Returns survey of large retailers, 72% charged for at least some returns in 2025, up from 66% in 2024 Reported. Loop says 65.2% of its Shopify merchants charge on some return outcomes, averaging $9.04 Reported. Coverage of the 2025 holidays listed these mail-return fees:
| Retailer | Fee, as reported in December 2025 |
|---|---|
| TJ Maxx and Marshalls | $11.99 per mailed return |
| Macy’s | $9.99 per mailed return, waived for loyalty members |
| Dillard’s | $9.95 label fee |
| JCPenney | $8 per mailed return |
| J.Crew | $7.50 per mailed return |
| Abercrombie & Fitch | $7 on mailed returns |
| Urban Outfitters | $5 on most mailed returns |
| Zara | $4.95 on mailed returns |
| H&M | $3.99 on mailed returns |
ReportedCBS News, December 26, 2025; TheStreet, December 21, 2025. Fees change; check each retailer’s current policy before citing it.
Note the word that repeats: mailed. Every retailer on the list has stores, and the fee falls on mailed returns, which steers customers to return in person, where they may buy something else. Amazon’s 2023 fee made the logic explicit: $1 for returning at a UPS Store when a Whole Foods, Amazon Fresh or Kohl’s drop-off was closer Reported. A DTC brand without stores that adds a mail fee isn’t steering anyone. It’s charging everyone.
In the same 2025 survey, of retailers that began charging, 47% saw more complaints, 37% said they lost customers, 34% saw average order value fall and 24% saw sales fall Reported. A year earlier, 54% said fees had cut return rates Reported. Both can be true. The question is whether a fee cuts returns more cheaply than it cuts customers, and Bower and Maxham’s findings in chapter 3 are the reason to worry.
For a century, L.L.Bean took back almost anything, at any age. In February 2018 it moved to a one-year limit with proof of purchase, while still covering manufacturing defects after that. The company said it had lost $250 million over five years on returned items that had to be destroyed, and that such returns had doubled over that period Reported. Its chairman said some customers had come to treat the guarantee as “a lifetime product replacement program, expecting refunds for heavily worn products used over many years” Reported. Within days a Chicago customer sued, seeking class-action status Reported.
The lessons carry to a small brand. The change targeted a specific abuse, the generous core survived (a year is still long), and the company explained itself with numbers. The lawsuit is the last lesson: a policy that has been part of the brand for years is part of the price customers think they paid, and taking it away feels like a price rise.
A fee cuts returns. The only question is whether it cuts them faster than it cuts customers.
Different customers seeing different terms is a pricing test, with legal and reputational risk. Disclose each customer’s terms before they buy, never change terms after purchase, and have counsel review the design. If a customer-level test isn’t possible, use a before-and-after with a comparison group the change didn’t touch, such as another country you ship to.
This is one chapter of The Return Trip, which is free and readable in full on a single page with no form in front of it.