A currency, a ladder, a recurring event and proof people win. OVRLND had built all four and was selling discounts instead.
OVRLND gives away vehicles: a restored Bronco, a Tacoma, a 1985 Toyota pickup. Customers buy gear and entry packs, and every dollar buys ten entries. When I rebuilt its retention plan in July 2026, the diagnosis took one sentence. The company had already built a game, and its email program wasn't playing it.
The game had four parts. A currency: $1 buys 10 entries. A status ladder: membership tiers from Bronze to Platinum. A recurring event: weekly draws for members. And proof people win: real winners, drawn live. That's a complete loop engine, the same one Whatnot runs with auctions and giveaways and Binance ran with tiers and token sales.
The welcome flow, meanwhile, ended in a coupon ladder: 25% off membership, then 50%.
ReportedDifferent flows reach different people at different stages, so read the order, not the ratios. The Tacoma figure was earned when orders averaged $35 to $45, not the $22 to $24 of mid-2026.
The coupon tail earned $237 on 27,326 sends. The receipt that simply told buyers how many entries they had just locked earned more per person than anything else in the account. It had no discount in it and, at first, not even a number.
A discount ends the game. A scoreboard keeps it going.
The plan was one idea executed everywhere: show players their score. Three rules made the scoreboard work for the business and stay honest with the customer.
Nir Eyal's Hooked names the last step of a habit loop investment: something the user puts in that makes the next trigger more likely. Lifetime entries are exactly that. A player with 1,860 lifetime entries has something to lose by not coming back.
In the US, a prize, a chance and a required purchase together make a lottery, which private companies can't run. Sweepstakes stay legal by giving a free alternative method of entry with equal standing. That's why Whatnot's Buyer Appreciation Giveaways carry a free web form, and why every OVRLND mechanic went to counsel before it shipped.
The review turned that into a design rule: in a paid sweepstakes, every mechanic is a legal structure and every displayed number is a representation. Compliance is a design input, not a sign-off at the end. Three examples from the plan:
The plan's list of cuts was as long as its list of plays. No entry multipliers in flows. No bolt-on points, badges or spin-wheels: entries already are the points. One device per moment: the entries receipt stays in post-purchase, where it's true, instead of being pasted into every flow until it means nothing.
You don't need a sweepstakes to use this. Any brand with repeat purchase can find its currency (points that buy something real, progress toward a product), its ladder, its recurring event (a monthly drop, a weekly restock) and its proof (real customers, named with permission). Most already have three of the four and bury them under discounts.
Rank your flows by revenue per recipient over 90 days and mark which ones run on a discount and which on progress, status or an event. If the discount flows sit at the top, your customers are buying on price, and the game is a feature to test, not the engine.
This is one chapter of Close the Loop, which is free and readable in full on a single page with no form in front of it.